Re: [PATCH 0/2] Bits from git-pb
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Jul 30, 2005, 17:33 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v8xzo42ru.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20050730103103.GB26188@pasky.ji.cz>
Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz> writes:
>> (iii) Do wild things in the git-pb branch and send you patches. > > So I assume (iii) holds?
I have not answered this because I have not made up my mind. Certainly (iii) is probably the least work for me.
My gut feeling is that I can deal with any of the above, but even when I pull from your tree, I expect to pull into "pu" first and after that the patches will go through my regular reshuffling cycle just like other patches I receive from e-mails. This may or may not cause "interesting" troubles when I merge again from git-pb, but we will see.