Re: [PATCH 2/3] Rebase to parent branch after git-fetch in "stg pull".

From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Feb 3, 2007, 23:01 UTC
Message-ID: <7v8xfe3kwo.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <20070203214619.GM5362@nan92-1-81-57-214-146.fbx.proxad.net>

Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org> writes:

Show 10 quoted lines

> On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 11:25:28PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> OK, tried again and 'stg pull' doesn't update the base with the last
>> patch in the series ('stg rebase origin' updates it). I don't have
>> anything set up in my gitconfig in this area.
>
> So now that this particular problem has a fix, let's fix everything
> related.
>
> Since branch.*.merge accept local ref names, there is probably far
> more to change that what I initially feared.

If that is the case maybe we should fix branch.*.merge not to match the local tracking branch name. Matching it with local tracking branch name when the remote name does not match was werely a fallback to help broken configurations confused people might create by hand, and has never been the part of sane practice at all.