Re: Unresolved issues
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Feb 26, 2007, 05:33 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v8xelo52x.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702260455020.16708@beast.quantumfyre.co.uk>
Julian Phillips <julian@quantumfyre.co.uk> writes:
Show 9 quoted lines
>> I was kind of waiting for dust from Santi's code shuffling to >> settle down, because the series moderately conflicts with it. I >> wanted to take Santi's patch first as it was supposed to be a >> clean-up without any functionality changes, although it was kind >> of painful to really make sure there is no regression. > > Indeed. I was thinking pretty much the same. It seems unnecessary to > make Santi rebase his patch without any evidence that the jc/fetch > topic is actually urgently needed by anyone.
Sorry, too late --- it's a done deal. Partial C rewrite of git-fetch is now in 'next'.