Re: What's in git.git (Sep 2008, #02; Wed, 10)
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Sep 11, 2008, 22:02 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v8wtys5n8.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <48C8E061.5030904@fastmail.fm>
Michael J Gruber <michaeljgruber+gmane@fastmail.fm> writes:
> I think the cleanest approach would consist in introducing another > linkgit macro (for everything linkgit:git-) which ouputs dashed resp. > dashless forms for docbook (i.e. man) resp. html targets. I'll cook up a > POC if noone keeps me from doing so ;)
I personally think the links are Ok to be left as they are in git-foo form but if there is a good way to persuade manual viewers to display "git foo" and still follow "man git-foo", that would be great.
Names of the programs in "git-foo" form in the plain text, unless they are the server side programs, should be updated to say "git foo" (cf. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/95436/focus=95443)