Re: [PATCH 5/5] docs/checkout: clarify what "non-branch" means
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Apr 14, 2009, 04:20 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v8wm3c1cn.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <200904132340.36191.mlevedahl@gmail.com>
Mark Levedahl <mlevedahl@gmail.com> writes:
> I think the question being posed is: Would unifying branch names across all > git commands (i.e., always accepting refs/heads/master as naming branch > master, and accepting master when that is unambiguous) sufficiently benefit > new users...
My knee-jerk reaction is that what you are saying is backwards.
When do new people even need to know about refs/heads vs refs/tags with modern Porcelain command set?