Re: [PATCH] t2017: redo physical reflog existance check
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Aug 24, 2010, 16:57 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v8w3wx823.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20100824040347.GA19817@burratino>
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> writes:
> The principle (though we do not always adhere to it) is that test > scripts should pass or fail based only on advertised behavior, not > implementation details. That way, _later_ any person who wants to > improve the implementation will not be impeded by tests.
Well and 'nuff said ;-) Thanks.