Re: [PATCHv4 1/2] git-p4: add test case for RCS keywords
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Feb 9, 2012, 22:55 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v8vkbvcpg.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <1328785409-30936-2-git-send-email-luke@diamand.org>
Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org> writes:
> +create_kw_file() {
> + cat <<'EOF' > $1Please start this shell function like this instead:
create_kw_file () {
cat <<\EOF >"$1"The first line is merely cosmetic but matches the convention used in our shell scripts better.
As to the second line:
* Quoting "$1" should not be strictly necessary according to POSIX rules, but we saw reports that some shells "helpfully" give unnecessary warnings when $1 (or whatever variable that holds the name of the file the output is redirected into) contains $IFS characters.
* An indent in our shell scripts is a HT, not a SP (or four spaces or whatever).
* And our convention is not to have an extra SP after redirection '>' (or '<') operator.
Show 19 quoted lines
> +test_expect_success 'init depot' '
> + (
> + cd "$cli" &&
> + echo file1 >file1 &&
> + p4 add file1 &&
> + p4 submit -d "change 1" &&
> + create_kw_file kwfile1.c &&
> + p4 add kwfile1.c &&
> + p4 submit -d "Add rcw kw file" kwfile1.c
> + )
> +'
> +
> +p4_append_to_file() {
> + f=$1
> + p4 edit -t ktext $f &&
> + echo "/* $(date) */" >> $f &&
> + p4 submit -d "appending a line in p4" &&
> + cat $f
> +}Surround all occurrences of '$f' with double-quotes, e.g.
cat "$f"
to avoid unexpected breakage when later somebody tries to use a file whose name happens to contain a space. The first assignment "f=$1" can stay as-is.
Show 8 quoted lines
> + > +# Create some files with RCS keywords. If they get modified > +# elsewhere then the version number gets bumped which then > +# results in a merge conflict if we touch the RCS kw lines, > +# even though the change itself would otherwise apply cleanly. > +test_expect_failure 'cope with rcs keyword expansion damage' ' > + "$GITP4" clone --dest="$git" //depot && > + cd "$git" &&
Please do not cd around in test script outside a subshell. Otherwise, any failure in a subsequent command in this && chain before you reach the next "cd" will leave you in an unexpected directory and can break later tests.
The worst example would be
test_expect_something 'one' '
mkdir -p git/play/pen &&
cd git/play/pen &&
do something &&
cd ../../.. &&
do something that potentially can fail &&
cd git/play/pen &&
do something
'
# blindly assuming the above succeeded up to the last 'cd git'
test_expect_something 'two' '
cd ../../.. &&
rm -fr git &&
do something else
'If the first test fails in the middle before it brings you back down to 'git/play/pen' with the last 'cd git/playpen', then the next test moves you up three levels and you will be running "rm -fr" on a wrong 'git'!