Re: [PATCH 2/3] run-command: Be more informative about what failed
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jan 31, 2013, 23:57 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v8v78ewhx.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20130131223559.GC21729@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> But it is not much code, and sometimes it is surprising what information > can be helpful when debugging, so like you, I am not opposed, just > doubtful.
Yes, exactly my feeling.
Perhaps I should just amend the 'stdin' and friends away without asking Stephen to reroll. In the other two I did not see any issues. I've queued all three of them including this one but as separate topics.
Thanks.