Re: git binary directory?
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Nov 6, 2005, 20:15 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v7jbly1lh.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0511060816390.3316@g5.osdl.org>
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> writes:
> Right now, for a 1.0 release, I suspect that the "put the git binaries > somewhere else" just isn't worth it. It will break existing scripts that > use the binaries directly (we've already broken the kernel.org snapshot > scripts about a million times with just _renaming_ the binaries ;)
Although I _really_ wanted a 1.0 soonish, I personally feel that this change is better done now than later, if we are eventually going to do it anyway. "Never" _might_ be better than "now", but I suspect "later" or "post 1.0" is worse.