Re: [PATCH] Make list of features auto-managed.
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jun 21, 2007, 19:32 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v7ipxw1bq.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.pobox.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LFD.0.99.0706211137020.20596@xanadu.home>
Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> writes:
> Well, just in case my opinion matters...
Well, you already do ;-)
> I don't like this feature list idea at all.
... and thanks for bringing a bit of sanity to this thread.
Show 6 quoted lines
> When you need git behavior X and you know that it appeared in version Y > then you only need to test for git_version >= Y. Determining that > particular Y is much easier after the facts using the commit log than > trying to anticipate what item should be added to a feature list for > future usage. In fact the same argument as for not explicitly recording > renames in commit objects should apply here.
Very well put; that is exactly what I wanted to say in two messages ago.