git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: post-update hook

From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date
Nov 13, 2008, 17:08 UTC
Message-ID
<7v7i77h7tp.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To
<b9fd99020811130753o13c5aa0cj79126a502d449cde@mail.gmail.com>
"Jeremy Ramer" <jdramer@gmail.com> writes:
Show 8 quoted lines
> ...  I tried editting
> the post-update hook as follows
>
> #!/bin/sh
> echo Update changes...
> git checkout master .
>
> but it does not seem to make any difference.

By above do you mean you do not even see "Update changes...", or do you mean you do see that message but "checkout" does not seem to do anything?

I notice that you said you "tried _editing_"; did you also enable it?

If you enabled it, you would see "Update changes..." but notice that "git checkout master" reports modifications. Try adding "-f" between "checkout" and "master".

> ...  Am I missing something
> in the way post-update works?
That, or in the way "checkout" works.

By the way, this is one reason why pushing directly into the checked out branch of a non-bare repository is not optimal. A recommended practice is to make the automation pretend as if you did a pull from the remote,

> ...  It would be really nice to get this
> working so I don't have to log into each remote and do a pull.
without actually having to log into each remote and run "pull" there.
 * Realize that if you did go to the remote and run "pull", then the
   change from the local machine is copied (via the underlying "fetch"
   that is run by "pull") in "remotes/origin/master", not to the branch
   "master".  And then the result is merged.
   IOW, 
	remote$ git pull
   when fully spelled out, is:
	remote$ git fetch local1 master:remotes/origin/master
        remote$ git merge remotes/origin/master
   That is, "master" branch tip from local1 goes to remote branch
   "origin/master" at remote1, and it is merged to whatever is checked
   out.
 * Arrange that if you push from local1 to remote1, the above
   automatically happens, in post-update hook.  So
   (1) Do not push into 'master'; IOW, do not:
	local1$ git push remote1 master:master ;# BAD
       Instead, push into the remotes/origin/master, to mimic _as if you
       fetched in the opposite direction_, like so:
	local1$ git push remote1 master:refs/remotes/origin/master
       Notice that this corresponds to what happens in the "git fetch"
       phase if you pulled in the reverse.  So all the hook needs to do is
       to merge.
   (2) Arrange post-update on the remote end to run the merge, when a push
       came to "origin/master", something like:
	#!/bin/sh
        case " $* " in
        *' refs/remotes/origin/master '*)
        	cd .. ;# you would be in .git -- go to the root of tree
                git merge refs/remotes/origin/master
                ;;
	esac
        I didn't test this, though...

The advantage of doing it this way is that you can configure it so that it does not matter in which direction you actually work. When you _do_ have to go to the remote side to get the changes from local (perhaps on some emergency that keeps you at remote), you can do a "git pull local" and you can expect that the exact same thing as what your post-update script ordinarily does happens.

Previous: Jeremy RamerNext: Jeremy Ramer
Message 2 of 4 in “post-update hook”
  1. Jeremy RamerNov 13, 2008
  2. Junio C HamanoNov 13, 2008
  3. Jeremy RamerNov 13, 2008
  4. Junio C HamanoNov 13, 2008

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.