Re: [BUG] incorrect search result returned when using git log with a future date parameter
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jan 30, 2013, 22:22 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v7gmujoqe.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20130130221544.GA15680@google.com>
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> writes:
Show 9 quoted lines
>> When it is fed 2013-02-12, it is ambiguous and "approxidate" can and >> should use whatever heuristics (including rejection of future) to >> guess what the user wanted, but 2013-02-13 cannot be interpreted in >> any other way, so we should parse it as such. > > FWIW, if you said 02/12/2013, I'd agree, but I've never seen someone > using 2013-02-12 to mean December 2. > > So that suggests another possible tweak on top. :)
I think in the original context that triggered the "be more friendly to Europeans" discussion long time ago, some correlations between the delimiting characters (i.e. 'xxxx-xx-xx' vs 'xxxx.xx.xx' vs 'xxxx/xx/xx') and month-day ordering convention. I do not recall if we actually added that as a signal when disambiguating, though.