Re: [PATCH 2/3] push: fail early with detached HEAD and current
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> writes:
Show 15 quoted lines
> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>> case PUSH_DEFAULT_CURRENT:
>>> + if (!branch)
>>> + die(_(message_detached_head_die), remote->name);
>>> add_refspec("HEAD");
>>> break;
>>
>> Would it hurt to do
>>
>> if (!branch_get(NULL))
>> die(...);
>>
>> here, without the first hunk?
>
> And how would I change the add_refspec() call to take branch->name in [3/3]?By doing something like this, perhaps?
struct ... branch;
switch (...) {
...
case it-only-matters-here:
branch = branch_get(NULL);
if (!branch)
die(...);
}