Re: [PATCH 1/7] Using svn pools seems to solve the memory leak problem

From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Nov 2, 2005, 22:38 UTC
Message-ID: <7v64raptdq.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <E1EXQWT-000504-Qw@localhost.localdomain>

I see you are resending the previous round after splitting, but could you be a bit more careful about the commit log? One liner title that is self-sufficient (as opposed to just the initial part of one sentence, cut off at whereever your editor happened to decide to fold line), which goes to Subject:, and the body of the message as a separate paragraph.

Especially something like this (5/7) does not make much sense:

    From: Yaacov Akiba Slama <ya@slamail.org>
    Subject: [PATCH 5/7] When copying files and/or directories from several branches in one single
    Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 23:51:57 +0200

    revision, all these branches are used as parents of the commit.