Re: [PATCH] fmt-merge-msg: detached HEAD
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Jan 26, 2007, 23:45 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v64atuzbc.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <8aa486160701260215p6a0af653qf110aa2679452c6@mail.gmail.com>
"Santi Béjar" <sbejar@gmail.com> writes:
Show 8 quoted lines
>> > For me, 'Merge ... into master' and 'Merge ... into HEAD' are equally >> > useful, so do not show them by default. And git always merges into >> > HEAD. >> >> I was wondering if people might prefer rewording it to "into >> detached HEAD". > > I prefer my patch, but your rewording is OK also.
I do not personally care either way -- the question is "is merging while your head is detached a major deal, or is it just one of the random insignificant merges and it does not matter where it happened?"