Re: git rebase -i
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Feb 19, 2009, 10:09 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v63j6oi0d.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <FEE581A3-C858-45CF-B545-8F7187FCCE40@ai.rug.nl>
Pieter de Bie <pdebie@ai.rug.nl> writes:
Show 8 quoted lines
> On 19 feb 2009, at 09:21, John Tapsell wrote: > >> Would there be any objections to making 'git rebase -i' default to >> HEAD~10 or maybe 16 or 20. Having sensible defaults for commands >> helps a bit with making it easier to use. > > I'd prefer something a bit less arbitrary, like using the tracked head > for a tracking branch.
I'd say that might be a very sane default for users or "branch --track" and/or "pull --rebase", both for i-rebase and rebase.