Re: Git merge selective files
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jun 9, 2009, 20:54 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v63f5ku1e.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <32541b130906091239x1c92a1caxd260983a66e8025f@mail.gmail.com>
Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com> writes:
> And the "'merge --squash' and don't commit the changes you don't want" > option looks okay to me too.
Whatever you do to prepare the tree contents to suit the desire of the original request, I think it is essential not to record the result of such an operation as a merge (because it is not, and it will screw up later merges).
Use of "merge --squash" in this thread is a very good suggestion.
Good job.