Re: [PATCH] block-sha1: more good unaligned memory access candidates
Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> writes:
Show 12 quoted lines
> As it is now, I was about to suggest:
>
> git mv block-sha1/sha1.[ch] .
> rmdir block-sha1
> rm -r mozilla-sha1
> rm -r arm
> rm -r ppc
>
> and remove support for openssl's SHA1 usage, making this implementation
> unconditional. After all it is faster, or so close to be faster than
> the alternatives, that we should probably cut on the extra dependency
> and simplify portability issues at the same time.
Wow. Is it now faster than the arm/ and ppc/ hand-tweaked assembly?