Re: [PATCH 2/2] Document date formats accepted by parse_date()
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Dec 2, 2009, 22:54 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v638p9ebz.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20091203073313.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com>
Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com> writes:
> Is there something wrong with 'show'? > > nana.git% ./test-date show '2005-04-07T22:13:13' > 2005-04-07T22:13:13 -> 40 years ago
Heh, you fooled me, and Peff is right. "test-date show" does not interpret its input any way other than as seconds-since-epoch.
I agree with the "native->internal" part of the suggestion. What see by default in "git show" output is merely the ctime(3) format followed by timezone. I don't mind if we call that "git native", even though I suspect we do _not have to_ invent new word for that.
Also "test-date parse" seems to accept things like these:
'2009.04.07 20:21:22 -0000'
'04/07/2009 20:21:22 -0000'
'07.04.2009 20:21:22 -0000'