git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: Signed push progress?

From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date
Sep 28, 2011, 16:35 UTC
Message-ID
<7v62kc1v7m.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To
<20110928075054.GA13727@orbis-terrarum.net>
"Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@gentoo.org> writes:
> from CVS to Git (we're very close now), we've decided that the signed
> pushes will provide better security than our plan of previous plan of
> using signed notes, so we'd like to see signed pushes succeed.

Could you elaborate on your "previous plan" a bit? What is a signed note, how would it help validate the authenticity, how do developers interact using it and what do you perceive as weaknesses compared to the signed push that we discussed a few weeks ago?

Previous: Robin H. JohnsonNext: Junio C Hamano
Message 2 of 4 in “Signed push progress?”
  1. Robin H. JohnsonSep 28, 2011
  2. Junio C HamanoSep 28, 2011
  3. What's next for "signed push"?Junio C Hamano, Sep 29, 2011
  4. Dmitry IvankovSep 29, 2011

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.