Re: [PATCH] stash: treat numerical arguments as shorthand for stash@{n}
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Dec 26, 2012, 02:08 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v623pr2ey.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <1356482314-29044-1-git-send-email-peter@pcc.me.uk>
Peter Collingbourne <peter@pcc.me.uk> writes:
> This patch causes git-stash to treat any argument consisting of
> between one and three numerical digits as if it were of the form
> `stash@{<n>}`, where `<n>` is the argument supplied.Inperative mood.
Show 5 quoted lines
>
> This is a significant usability improvement for people dealing with
> multiple stashes, as it avoids redundantly typing 'stash@{' ... '}'
> (which involves shifted characters on most keyboards) in the very
> common case that the stash was created using git-stash.Be less subjective by dropping "significant"; do not shove the judgement down the throat of reviewers.
Show 11 quoted lines
> diff --git a/Documentation/git-stash.txt b/Documentation/git-stash.txt
> index 711ffe1..8ffcc97 100644
> --- a/Documentation/git-stash.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/git-stash.txt
> @@ -40,6 +40,10 @@ the usual reflog syntax (e.g. `stash@{0}` is the most recently
> created stash, `stash@{1}` is the one before it, `stash@{2.hours.ago}`
> is also possible).
>
> +Any argument supplied to this command consisting of between one
> +and three numerical digits is treated as if it were of the
> +form `stash@{<n>}`, where `<n>` is the argument supplied.Why up to 999, not 99 or 9999?
How about doing it this way instead:
if commit=$(git rev-parse --verify --quiet $arg^0)
then
: that is a commit-ish, even though it is 0123
elif test "$arg" = 0 || expr "$arg" : '[1-9][0-9]*$' >/dev/null &&
commit=$(git rev-parse --verify --quiet "stash@{$arg}^0")
then
: $arg is decimal integer and stash@{$arg} is a commit-ish
else
BAD
fiShow 10 quoted lines
> diff --git a/t/t3903-stash.sh b/t/t3903-stash.sh
> index 5dfbda7..5467acf 100755
> --- a/t/t3903-stash.sh
> +++ b/t/t3903-stash.sh
> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ test_expect_success 'parents of stash' '
> '
>
> test_expect_success 'applying bogus stash does nothing' '
> - test_must_fail git stash apply stash@{1} &&
> + test_must_fail git stash apply 1 &&If you are _adding_ a feature, do not remove tests for existing one; otherwise you will risk masking a breakage you may be introducing to an existing feature. Add tests to check that (1) your new feature works when it should, and (2) your new feature does *not* kick in when it should not. For example, if you only accept up to 3-digit decimal integer, make sure feeding 0000 (or something that is *not* 3-digit decimal integer) does not trigger your new feature.
Show 9 quoted lines
> echo 1 >expect &&
> test_cmp expect file
> '
> @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ test_expect_success 'drop middle stash' '
> git stash &&
> echo 9 > file &&
> git stash &&
> - git stash drop stash@{1} &&
> + git stash drop 1 &&Likewise throughout the patch.