Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] t7800: fix tests when difftool uses --no-symlinks
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Mar 25, 2013, 14:54 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v620f34xw.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAJDDKr7Uz44TQ8y2jpjhNadWUCD5Mo=GLdaLLh99eENARQSwcw@mail.gmail.com>
David Aguilar <davvid@gmail.com> writes:
Show 20 quoted lines
> This makes me wonder whether the modifiable mode should be made > more explicit, either in the documentation or via a flag. > > Imagine if --dir-diff also honored --edit and --no-edit flags. > > Right now --edit is the default. If we had foreseen these various > edge cases and unintended copy-backs then we may have initially > chosen --no-edit as the default, but that's not really my point. > > What I'm thinking is that it might be good for the tool to > learn --edit/--no-edit so that the symlink/copy-back heuristic > can be documented alongside that option. Users can then know > what to expect when using this mode. --no-edit would also be > faster since it can avoid all these extra steps. > > It could also learn "difftool.dirDiffEditable" to control the > default, which would eliminate the pain in needing to supply > the flag on every invocation. > > What do you think about officially supporting a read-only mode?
Yeah, actually that was what I've been assuming the default (not suggesting to change the default behaviour here).