Re: How is working on arbitrary remote heads supposed to work in Cogito (+ PATCH)?
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Jul 29, 2005, 02:24 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v4qaeqrh3.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20050728183904.GA24948@pasky.ji.cz>
Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz> writes:
> One of the Cogito design bits is that branch name is something local to > the repository. When you are adding a branch, the local name you assign > it is your private thing repository-wise, and doesn't have to have any > correlation to other repositories you might interact width.
I do not disagree with that. I think branch name is mostly a local matter. However, I happen to think that two repositories you use send-pack (not clone which uses completely different protocol) to sync one from the other are semantically equivalent ones, except that the destination may be a strict subset. I think of it as "a copy I throw at a public place to show what I have in my private repository I work in", so,...