Re: [PATCH] git-rebase: suggest to use git-add instead of git-update-index

From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Jun 2, 2007, 19:07 UTC
Message-ID: <7v4plqqion.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <20070602175949.GB19952@diku.dk>

Jonas Fonseca <fonseca@diku.dk> writes:

Show 10 quoted lines

> The command is part of the main porcelain making git-add more
> appropriate.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonas Fonseca <fonseca@diku.dk>
> ---
>  git-rebase.sh |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>  I don't know if this is good or not, maybe it is a matter of taste, but
>  as a new git user I prefer to use git add.

I like it.  Thanks.