Re: git-merge: inconsistent manual page.
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Oct 31, 2007, 00:05 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v4pg8jghg.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <87wst44cvb.fsf@osv.gnss.ru>
Sergei Organov <osv@javad.com> writes:
Show 15 quoted lines
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes: >> Subject: git-merge: document but discourage the historical syntax >> >> Historically "git merge" took its command line arguments in a >> rather strange order. Document the historical syntax, and also >> document clearly that it is not encouraged in new scripts. >> >> There is no reason to deprecate the historical syntax, as the >> current code can sanely tell which syntax the caller is using, >> and existing scripts by people do use the historical syntax. > > OK, your patch is better than what I've suggested. The only thing that > your patch seems to be missing is prepending -m to <msg>:: in the > OPTIONS section. Yeah, it could be more strict to just describe <msg>, > ...
Nah, you are absolutely right. We describe "-s <strategy>" under the headline with the leading "-s".
Will fix.