Re: [PATCH 1/2] docs: clarify git-branch --list behavior
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> writes:
Show 10 quoted lines
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 1:45 AM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
>> +If `--list` is given, or if there are no non-option arguments, existing
>> +branches are listed; the current branch will be highlighted with an
>> +asterisk. Option `-r` causes the remote-tracking branches to be listed,
>> +and option `-a` shows both local and remote branches. If a `<pattern>`
>> +is given, it is used as a shell wildcard to restrict the output to
>> +matching branches. If multiple patterns are given, a branch is shown if
>> +any it is matched by any of the patterns.
>
> s/if any it is/if it is/
Thanks; I'll squash this in. Peff, no need to resend.
Documentation/git-branch.txt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/git-branch.txt b/Documentation/git-branch.txt
index 01aa87f..2635dee 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-branch.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-branch.txt
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ asterisk. Option `-r` causes the remote-tracking branches to be listed,
and option `-a` shows both local and remote branches. If a `<pattern>`
is given, it is used as a shell wildcard to restrict the output to
matching branches. If multiple patterns are given, a branch is shown if
-any it is matched by any of the patterns. Note that when providing a
+it matches any of the patterns. Note that when providing a
`<pattern>`, you must use `--list`; otherwise the command is interpreted
as branch creation.
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>