Re: [PATCH 0/2] core-git documentation update
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- May 8, 2005, 23:35 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v3bsx2sv8.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <427E83EA.2000104@dgreaves.com>
>>>>> "DG" == David Greaves <david@dgreaves.com> writes:
DG> The intention now was for me to go through Linus' HEAD and verify the DG> docs actually documented the HEAD. DG> Then I think comparing the HEAD to jit-jc and preparing patches for that?
That one is up to you, but if your patches are against git-jc, it would make _my_ life simpler and hopefully would make merge easier for Linus when he returns.
After he returns, it would probably not make much sense sending patch against git-jc, unless all of the following conditions hold true: (1) what is already merged to git-jc conflicts with what you are modifying, (2) all changes in git-jc are trivially correct and veriy likely to hit Linus tree without being rejected, and (3) Linus is too busy and lags behind git-jc.