Re: [PATCH] gitweb: Move git_get_last_activity subroutine earlier
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Oct 28, 2006, 19:24 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v3b988cqn.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <ei0ags$l1l$1@sea.gmane.org>
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> writes:
Show 10 quoted lines
> Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Why is this needed? > > This is purely cosmetic, and originally was to be first patch in series > converting git_summary, git_heads and git_tags to use of git-for-each-ref... > but unfortunately git-for-each-ref lacks sorting on taggerdate OR > committerdate (i.e. use taggerdate if applicable, committerdate otherwise). > > I'd rather not have git_get_last_activity between two parse_* subroutines...
Ok, will apply but the last line of your response _should_ have been in the proposed commit log message without being asked.