Re: rename detection limit checking, cherry picking, and git am -3
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Sep 17, 2007, 04:27 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v3axd5325.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20070917034742.GG3099@spearce.org>
"Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org> writes:
> I actually don't see why cherry-pick can't be defined in terms > of `format-patch|am -3`. It probably would be faster in almost > all cases.
Heh, people often suggested that rebase should get --merge as default, and I resisted that.
I think it would make sense to do the consolidated backend for rebase, revert, cherry-pick and am (I have been tentatively calling this "git replay") primarily based on the "patch with fallback to 3-way" like format-patch piped to "am -3", with an option to do merge-recursive.