Re: cherry picking changesets instead of commits
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- May 28, 2008, 20:46 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v3ao2tawd.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <7f9d599f0805281242w5769a100s1153c2101992ff55@mail.gmail.com>
"Geoffrey Irving" <irving@naml.us> writes:
Show 17 quoted lines
> commit a1bac5e1aa52f9a78733aa35a0a7e820df618301 > Author: Geoffrey Irving <irving@naml.us> > Date: Wed May 28 12:38:11 2008 -0700 > > doc: mention git-patch-id in git-cherry documentation > > diff --git a/Documentation/git-cherry.txt b/Documentation/git-cherry.txt > index b0468aa..9817fb5 100644 > --- a/Documentation/git-cherry.txt > +++ b/Documentation/git-cherry.txt > @@ -41,6 +41,8 @@ has been applied <upstream> under a different commit > id. For example, > this will happen if you're feeding patches <upstream> via email rather > than pushing or pulling commits directly. > > +For details about how patches are compared, see git-patch-id. > +
Thanks.
In manual pages, "SEE ALSO" section is a more appropriate place to do this kind of thing.