Re: [RFC] gitweb.perl t9500 t9501
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Aug 23, 2009, 02:09 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v3a7j2scq.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <4C812C4E-815B-478D-AEB1-3F1DEC5D3641@mailservices.uwaterloo.ca>
Mark A Rada <marada@uwaterloo.ca> writes:
> I have not been telling git-format-patch to use a specific width for > the diffstat, is the standard width supposed to be 70?
Perhaps there is some misconception here.
We try to keep our _code_ to fit in standard 80-column terminal. We also keep lines in the _log message_ shorter than 70-something so that after indentation by various programs (e.g. shortlog) and a few levels of quoting in the e-mail are added, the lines will still stay below 80-columns. These are standard practices.
And you may need to find a good place to break lines in your _code_, and your _log message_, to stay below that limit.
But that all happens inside your editor, before you touch format-patch nor your MUA.
The patch contents may contain long lines, such as
diff --git a/filename-that-is-long b/filename-that-is-long
or
@@ -old,lines +new,lines @@ original contents that is long
that is neither _code_ nor _log message_. They could easily go beyond 80-column, but that is normal, and they do not have any 70-column limit for you to worry about. They follow a different rule, namely, if format-patch (or "diff" in general) outputs something on a single line, that has to stay on a single line. "patch" expects each of these on a single line. Do not break them.
So make sure that you do not let your MUA perform any line-wrapping at random place in the message after you formatted your commits via format-patch, and you will be Ok.