Re: The merge from hell...
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Feb 3, 2006, 06:33 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v1wylj6i5.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0602022210540.3462@g5.osdl.org>
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> writes:
Show 8 quoted lines
> On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Brown, Len wrote: >> >> In the back of my head I was worried about using plain >> numbers when I saw somebody refer to "shorthand SHA1". >> Hopefully this is an idle worry and it is not possible >> for the tool to confuse a numeric branch name with a SHA1 id. > > It _is_ possible, but the rule is that references will be resolved first.
I have to admit that I had this broken for a while. The breakage was when you have the same numeric branch name _and_ tagname, then ref resolution was skipped and short SHA1 was taken. It _might_ have bitten somebody in real life until I fixed it. But I believe this is fixed now.
> It's pretty unlikely, of course. But it's one reason to try to avoid using > ref names that are numeric.
Or even non numeric ones, like "deadbeef".