Re: [PATCH] cache-tree: do not cache empty trees
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Feb 7, 2011, 20:48 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v1v3jvaef.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20110207095713.GA19653@do>
Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> writes:
> Perhaps it's not a good approach after all. What I wanted was to make > pre-1.8.0 tolerate empty trees created by 1.8.0. Perhaps it's better > to just let pre-1.8.0 refuse to work with empty trees, forcing users > to upgrade to 1.8.0?
I don't think we saw even something remotely resembles an agreement that empty tree is a good thing to have yet. Why are you rushing things?