Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Restrict when prefetcing occurs
- From
- Garima Singh <garimasigit@gmail.com>
- Date
- Apr 6, 2020, 11:57 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7c877d3b-e6fb-c9b0-f403-09133270017d@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7de2f54b-8704-a0e1-12aa-0ca9d3d70f6f@gmail.com>
On 4/6/2020 7:44 AM, Derrick Stolee wrote:
Show 17 quoted lines
> On 4/2/2020 4:28 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> I notice that a439b4ef (diff: skip batch object download when >> possible, 2020-03-30) by Garima seems to aim for something similar. >> >> I'll for now keep both topics with conflict resolution, but it may >> make sense for you two to compare notes. > > I pointed this out in [1]. I think the right thing to do is for > Garima's/my patch to rely on Jonathan's change. The commit needs > to be modified, not simply ejected, but it could be separated from > the rest of Garima's series. It is only a performance fix for > normal clones, but is critical for partial clones. > > Garima: do you think it would be easy to remove that patch if/when > you do a v4 and I can make a new series based on yours and Jonathan's > with the rename setting? >
Sure. I was thinking about rebasing my series on top of Jonathan's and adjusting as necessary, but it might be easier to just remove it and then have a new series based on mine and Jonathan's, like you suggested.
There hasn't been any feedback since I sent out v3. I will just re-roll v4 without this patch, to make sure pu no longer requires conflict resolution around the Bloom filter series.
Cheers! Garima Singh