Re: [RFC PATCH 08/11] rebase -i: use struct rebase_options to parse args
- From
Alban Gruin <alban.gruin@gmail.com>
- Date
- Mar 21, 2019, 21:13 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7ba0dc1a-b6dd-4ef6-81ee-495e32fc67cf@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20190319190317.6632-9-phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
Hi Phillip,
It’s nice to see your work on this on the list.
Le 19/03/2019 à 20:03, Phillip Wood a écrit :
Show 86 quoted lines
> From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
>
> In order to run `rebase -i` without forking `rebase--interactive` it
> will be convenient to use the same structure when parsing the options in
> cmd_rebase() and cmd_rebase__interactive().
>
> Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
> ---
> builtin/rebase.c | 203 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> 1 file changed, 112 insertions(+), 91 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/builtin/rebase.c b/builtin/rebase.c
> index c93f2aa629..33a2495032 100644
> --- a/builtin/rebase.c
> +++ b/builtin/rebase.c
> @@ -50,6 +50,73 @@ enum rebase_type {
> REBASE_PRESERVE_MERGES
> };
>
> +struct rebase_options {
> + enum rebase_type type;
> + const char *state_dir;
> + struct commit *upstream;
> + const char *upstream_name;
> + const char *upstream_arg;
> + char *head_name;
> + struct object_id orig_head;
> + struct commit *onto;
> + const char *onto_name;
> + const char *revisions;
> + const char *switch_to;
> + int root;
> + struct object_id *squash_onto;
> + struct commit *restrict_revision;
> + int dont_finish_rebase;
> + enum {
> + REBASE_NO_QUIET = 1<<0,
> + REBASE_VERBOSE = 1<<1,
> + REBASE_DIFFSTAT = 1<<2,
> + REBASE_FORCE = 1<<3,
> + REBASE_INTERACTIVE_EXPLICIT = 1<<4,
> + } flags;
> + struct argv_array git_am_opts;
> + const char *action;
> + int signoff;
> + int allow_rerere_autoupdate;
> + int keep_empty;
> + int autosquash;
> + char *gpg_sign_opt;
> + int autostash;
> + char *cmd;
> + int allow_empty_message;
> + int rebase_merges, rebase_cousins;
> + char *strategy, *strategy_opts;
> + struct strbuf git_format_patch_opt;
> + int reschedule_failed_exec;
> +};
> +
> +#define REBASE_OPTIONS_INIT { \
> + .type = REBASE_UNSPECIFIED, \
> + .flags = REBASE_NO_QUIET, \
> + .git_am_opts = ARGV_ARRAY_INIT, \
> + .git_format_patch_opt = STRBUF_INIT \
> + }
> +
> +static struct replay_opts get_replay_opts(const struct rebase_options *opts)
> +{
> + struct replay_opts replay = REPLAY_OPTS_INIT;
> +
> + sequencer_init_config(&replay);
> +
> + replay.action = REPLAY_INTERACTIVE_REBASE;
> + replay.signoff = opts->signoff;
> + replay.allow_ff = !(opts->flags & REBASE_FORCE);
> + if (opts->allow_rerere_autoupdate)
> + replay.allow_rerere_auto = opts->allow_rerere_autoupdate;
> + replay.allow_empty = 1;
> + replay.allow_empty_message = opts->allow_empty_message;
> + replay.verbose = opts->flags & REBASE_VERBOSE;
> + replay.reschedule_failed_exec = opts->reschedule_failed_exec;
> + replay.gpg_sign = xstrdup_or_null(opts->gpg_sign_opt);
> + replay.strategy = opts->strategy;
> +
> + return replay;
> +}
> +I wonder if `struct rebase_options` and `struct replay_options` could be merged, or at least have `replay_options` used in `rebase_options`, instead of converting one to the other. I think it would make things simpler and cleaner, but I don’t know how hard it would be, or if my assumption is correct.
Cheers, Alban