Re: [PATCH] bash completion: Add completion for 'git grep'
- From
Lee Marlow <lee.marlow@gmail.com>
- Date
- Aug 3, 2008, 07:31 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7968d7490808030031v39726af6r9f88feb28df02de7@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20080802210525.GD24723@spearce.org>
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> > Hmm. The has_doubledash test seems redundant since we don't do > anything with args that aren't --foo. Even though git-grep will > accept a tree-ish and thus completion of __git_refs here may > make sense. > > But that is very much a user question. Do users mostly search a > file in the current working directory, or do they mostly search > a tree-ish?
I haven't found myself using grep to search anything but the current working directory. I wonder whether __git_complete_file would be better than __git_refs. My issue with __git_complete_file in this case and also doing completion for 'git mv' is that it falls back to just __git_refs. Would it be better if it fell back to __git_refs and ls-tree for HEAD? That way when using completion to get to Documentation/git-grep.txt, it doesn't also show completions for Documentation/git-grep.{1,html,xml}.
-Lee