Re: Usage of git whatchanged
Hi
On Sun, Sep 14, 2025, at 14:48, Bjoern Bastian wrote:
> I still use 'git whatchanged' that has been available for a long time
> and though being longer than 'git log --raw' is much quicker to type,
> as 'git wh' is already sufficient for syntax completion. Obviously,
> for this reason I won't use it with the '--i-still-use-this' option.
`git log --raw --no-merged` is the closest equivalent.
What if you made a `wh` alias?
wh = log --raw --no-merged
--
Kristoffer Haugsbakk