git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: Worktree shares a common remote with main checkout

From
PWPhillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
Date
Apr 3, 2024, 15:30 UTC
Message-ID
<781ba921-e11e-4c9d-8764-1366b3043375@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<CA+2m0i_zGcFBd2+L_Q_foMQ=eJbXqUZGqDeOwfefg=Y4GMBRWw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Bill
On 03/04/2024 15:26, Bill Wallace wrote:
Show 23 quoted lines
> The problem is that one wants different default remotes for different
> worktrees - for example, suppose I'm creating a worktree for two
> different projects, plus the base repository is on the "origin"
> default remote.  I then have:
> base_repository - a directory with the base/default origin (call it
> 'origin' for now as the remote name)
> project1 - currently checked out with 'feat/1'
> project2 - current checkout out with 'feat/2'
> 
> Now, project1 is being developed against a remote repository
> 'project1-origin' and project2 is being developed against a remote
> repository 'project2-origin'
> However, both are getting merges from origin/main on their own
> projectX-origin/main branches
> 
> Now, when I'm the directory for project1 and I do any of:
>     git fetch
>     git checkout X
>     git push
> 
> I want the correct default to be chosen for the remote - for the
> base_repository that should be 'origin', while for project1 it should
> be 'project1-origin' etc.

You can set a different default remote for "git pull" for each branch by setting an upstream branch with "git branch --set-upstream-to" which sets "branch.<name>.remote" and "branch.<name>.merge" or "branch.<name>.rebase". You can also set a different remote to push to by setting "branch.<name>.pushRemote" - see the "git config" documentation. Would that help?

Best Wishes
Phillip
Show 71 quoted lines
> I KNOW I can specify those manually, and git push will give a
> suggestion, but I WANT all of them to default to the correct remote
> associated with that worktree so that I don't accidentally pick the
> wrong one or forget to update the correct repository.  This is to fix
> dumb fingers that sometimes do the wrong thing without thinking, and
> to try to reduce the number of things that don't get done
> accidentally.
> 
> What I'm doing now is to create a new non-worktree version against the
> projects directories, but that then doesn't share any data.
> 
> git remote add ... has nothing to do with this, but I want something like:
> 
> git worktree add project1 --default-remote project1-origin
> 
> The idea is to make the expectations of what happens to be consistent
> with cloning a new directory, or at least as close as possible to
> that.
> 
> Bill.
> 
> On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 at 13:29, Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2024, at 15:50, Bill Wallace wrote:
>>> This issue is just to fix an easy to make mistake when working with
>>> multiple remote origins and worktrees, where it is too easy to push to
>>> the wrong remote origin because one can't set the default origin on a
>>> per-worktree basis.
>>>
>>> What did you do before the bug happened? (Steps to reproduce your issue)
>>> Used
>>> * git worktree to create a worktree
>>> * git remote add to add a custom repository
>>> * git commit/push to try to push changes
>>>
>>> What did you expect to happen? (Expected behavior)
>>> Expected to have the git push recommend a remote origin that matched
>>> the worktree, but it defaults to 'origin' all
>>> the time, which means I need to checkout a clean clone from the
>>> specific origin I'm making changes for so that I don't accidentally
>>> push to the default origin.
>>>
>>> What happened instead? (Actual behavior)
>>> Suggests 'origin' as the default origin - which is CORRECT for the
>>> main git branch, but I want to use worktrees to allow working against
>>> several remote origins, with the default being determined by which
>>> worktree I'm in.
>>>
>>> What's different between what you expected and what actually happened?
>>> Suggested 'origin' for the --set-default rather than allowing me to
>>> define the origin I want, for example 'wayfarer' as teh name of my own
>>> remote that I have cloned on github.  The default origin is still
>>> supposed to be 'origin' for pulls/naming, but when I push, it needs to
>>> recommend the matching origin.
>>>
>>> Anything else you want to add:
>>> This is a bit of feature request, but the reason I'm listing it as a
>>> bug is it makes it very easy to make a mistake by pushing to the wrong
>>> origin for a new branch.
>>
>> I don’t understand the expectation. git-worktree(1) just gives you a new
>> worktree to work on a branch, do a bisect, maybe a rebase and so on. I
>> expect `git remote add <remote>` to have nothing to do with the current
>> worktree that I am in. A remote ref is for the repository, not
>> per-worktree.
>>
>> If you are creating a local branch based on this so-called
>> worktree-specific remote and this branch exists on this remote (and
>> *only* on that one) then you can use `git worktree --add --guess-remote`
>> to automatically track the remote branch.
> 
Previous: Bill WallaceNext: Bill Wallace
Message 6 of 8 in “Worktree shares a common remote with main checkout”
  1. Bill WallaceMar 22, 2024
  2. Rubén JustoMar 22, 2024
  3. Rubén JustoMar 22, 2024
  4. Kristoffer HaugsbakkMar 22, 2024
  5. Bill WallaceApr 3, 2024
  6. Phillip WoodApr 3, 2024
  7. Bill WallaceApr 3, 2024
  8. Bill WallaceApr 3, 2024

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.