Re: [RFC/PATCH] mergetool: clarify local/remote terminology
- From
Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 25, 2008, 20:09 UTC
- Message-ID
- <76718490802251209u240bc0b2s8e268c7f1943c3d9@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20080225192106.GB19666@sigill.intra.peff.net>
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
> Probably HEAD and HEAD~5 (perhaps along with their oneline logs). I > think the best we can do is "whatever the user said to get us here" > which is not something you can calculate after the fact; you have to > remember what the user said.
Right, so the porcelain would have to save this information somewhere for mergetool to access (yes/no/maybe?).
Anyway, that's why the first iteration of my patch takes --left and --right arguments so at least you can tell it how you got there.
j.