Re: What's cooking in git.git (Feb 2018, #02; Tue, 13)
- From
Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 14, 2018, 17:47 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7259deac-1d9b-fb01-e8dc-3ad7fdd8ecee@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqy3jvo57n.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
On 2/14/2018 12:23 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 16 quoted lines
> Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com> writes: > >> There have been a few "What's cooking" emails since I submitted v1 of >> "Serialized Git Commit Graph" and it has not appeared with a tracking >> branch. Is this a mistake, or is it something about the state of the >> review? > The latter. > > Once I pick up a topic and have it in 'pu', I'd be committing to > carrying it and keeping it up-to-date, while dealing with possible > conflicts with other topics. As I do not have infinite bandwidth, I > try not to chase targets that are still moving too rapidly, which in > turn means that a hot topic everybody is excited by its goal will > take more rerolls than other topics before hitting 'pu', because it > gets more good suggestions and it takes time for its patches to stop > morphing a lot.
Thanks for clarifying. That makes sense.
Show 6 quoted lines
> The discussion in the last and current rounds gave me an impression > that some stuff (e.g. "graph-head") are still likely to change quite > a lot during the review-response cycle. Is everybody happy with the > latest set of patches or are there issues raised already in the > review that are better addressed before we start making it interact > with other topics in flight?
To avoid causing a tangent in this thread, I'll send a message on the v3 thread summarizing what I plan to do for v4 and ask for consensus on that approach before I do.
Thanks, -Stolee