git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [RFC PATCH resend] builtin/repack: Honor --keep-pack and .keep when repacking promisor objects

From
TTTomáš Trnka <trnka@scm.com>
Date
Jan 31, 2025, 15:17 UTC
Message-ID
<7102402.jJDZkT8p0M@electra>
In-Reply-To
<xmqq34h0aq65.fsf@gitster.g>
On Thursday, 30 January 2025 23:32:34, CET Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I don't have a strong opinion about the technical aspects of this
> patch to be a reviewer.  I have no idea how you decided whom to Cc:,

I'm sorry again for spamming you unnecessarily and many thanks for suggesting more suitable reviewers.

Being a complete newcomer to Git development, I went by what the git-contacts tool suggested when I gave it my patch, since its output seemed to roughly agree with git log on builtin/repack.c, plus I also thought you might have a high-level opinion on where the test belongs. I didn't check the mailing list archives too thoroughly, so I was not aware of those discussion threads.

2T
Previous: Junio C Hamano
Message 3 of 3 in “builtin/repack: Honor --keep-pack and .keep when repacking promisor objects”
  1. builtin/repack: Honor --keep-pack and .keep when repacking promisor objectsTomáš Trnka, Jan 30, 2025
  2. Junio C HamanoJan 30, 2025
  3. Tomáš TrnkaJan 31, 2025

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.