Re: git clone problem through HTTP
- From
- Aubrey Li <aubreylee@gmail.com>
- Date
- Apr 20, 2007, 13:38 UTC
- Message-ID
- <6d6a94c50704200638y7cd3c81aj3ff7f78863f4ab8d@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704201245330.10595@reaper.quantumfyre.co.uk>
On 4/20/07, Julian Phillips <julian@quantumfyre.co.uk> wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Aubrey Li wrote: > > > I'm behind of a firewall on which the git port is not permitted, so I > > can only use http protocol. Unfortunately, I can't clone linus' git > > tree at all. > > Linus packs his refs, which means that currently you can't clone using > http, with any version of git.
I really don't understand why packed refs or not depend on the protocol. It doesn't make any sense.
> > Try http://repo.or.cz/r/linux-2.6.git/ instead? This appears to be a > straight clone, but without packed refs.
Does git support to update working copy to a different URL? for example, I clone the repo through GIT, and switch the working copy to HTTP, is it possible? Or clone it from http://repo.or.cz/r/linux-2.6.git, and switch it to www.kernel.org?
-Aubrey