git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: How to find the commit that erase a change

From
Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Date
Oct 9, 2019, 13:21 UTC
Message-ID
<67016186-a9ff-be2b-883d-bc93af48aad8@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<6cfb13f7.1fa14.16daea502c2.Coremail.wuzhouhui14@mails.ucas.ac.cn>
On 10/8/2019 11:51 PM, wuzhouhui wrote:
Show 43 quoted lines
>> -----Original Messages-----
>> From: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>
>> Sent Time: 2019-10-09 11:02:44 (Wednesday)
>> To: wuzhouhui <wuzhouhui14@mails.ucas.ac.cn>
>> Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, cuifang@sugon.com
>> Subject: Re: How to find the commit that erase a change
>>
>> wuzhouhui <wuzhouhui14@mails.ucas.ac.cn> writes:
>>
>>> I have a file which contains complicated change history. When I use
>>>     git log -p file
>>> to see all changes made in this file, I found that a change disappeared
>>> for no reason.
>>
>> "git log [-p] <pathspec>" is not about seeing *all* changes made to
>> the path(s) that match the pathspec.  Especially when your history
>> has merges, the command is to give you _one_ simplest explanation as
>> to how the contents of the path(s) came to be in the shape you see
>> in HEAD.
>>
>> So for example, if you have a history like this (time flows from
>> left to right):
>>
>>     O-----A-----B----M-----N
>>            \        /
>>             \      /
>>              X----Y
>>
>> where A or B did *not* touch "file", X added a definition of func()
>> to "file", Y reverted the change X made to "file", M made a natural
>> merge between B and Y and N did not touch "file", "git log N file"
>> would not even show the existence of commits X or Y.  In the larger
>> picture, at ancient time O, the file started without func(), and
>> none of the commits A, B, M or N felt the need to add it and as the
>> result, N does not need the unwanted func().  So "file's contents
>> are the same since O throughout the history reaching N" is given as
>> _one_ simplest explanation.
>>
>> The "--full-history" option may help, though.
> 
> "--full-history" doesn't resolve my problem, but
>     git log -p -c file
> does. I found that my change was erased in a merge commit.
In these cases of erased merge commits, I find that
	git log --simplify-merges -- file

works best for finding the merge responsible. Just the --full-history option may include many extra merges (if you work in a repo with many collaborators).

Thanks, -Stolee

Previous: wuzhouhui
Message 4 of 4 in “How to find the commit that erase a change”
  1. wuzhouhuiOct 9, 2019
  2. Junio C HamanoOct 9, 2019
  3. wuzhouhuiOct 9, 2019
  4. Derrick StoleeOct 9, 2019

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.