RE: git branch descriptions
- From
- Joel Reed <jreed@lantekcs.com>
- Date
- May 11, 2010, 12:38 UTC
- Message-ID
- <657A681BEF27534399890012B8C8E50E1AD63D2241@lcs-exchange01.Lantekcs.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <F658FEF6-8957-4815-8917-8545E166F6CC@adacore.com>
Geert Bosch wrote:
<snip>
Show 5 quoted lines
> It seems if we'd do branch descriptions at all, their main use > would be fore remote repositories. When you publish a branch, > you'd typically not rewrite it on a whim, so attaching a description > makes sense. Similarly, if you're tracking a remote repository, > it would be helpful to get some information for the branch.
For my usage, I have to strongly disagree! I _primarily_ wish I could add a description to LOCAL branches.
jr