Re: Announcement of Git wikibook

>     There is nothing wrong with either of the two approaches. They
> could both coexist but address different needs:
>     -- the manual should be more oriented on technical issues and
> addresses only the most recent versions;
>     -- the book should be more user-oriented, and more general,
> explaining how source management should be addressed by using git, and
> maybe make comparisons with may other versioning systems. Also the
> book could relate to many versions -- both old and new.
>
>     Also I would note that the wiki book is more easy to edit... If
> you spot errors or want to add something you just go and edit it and
> the effect is immediate. But in contrast sending patches involves some
> overhead...