Re: [PATCH] git-core-foo -> git-foo, except the core package
- From
- Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 15, 2005, 14:41 UTC
- Message-ID
- <625fc13d0511150641k353d7128pf72f3542da601104@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <43797C41.2050809@zytor.com>
On 11/15/05, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> This patch renames the tarball "git" rather than "git-core", and changes > the names of various packages from git-core-foo to git-foo. git-core is > still the true core package; an empty RPM package named "git" pulls in > ALL the git packages -- this makes updates work correctly, and allows > "yum install git" to do the obvious thing.
What about "yum remove git" ? I don't think that will work quite so well. The "git" package will be removed just fine since nothing depends on it, but git-<foo> will still remain. Maybe not that big of a deal, but it might not be obvious to some.
Also, what about http://www.gnu.org/software/git/git.html ? I seem to recall that was the reason the name git-core was used in the first place.
josh