Re: [PATCH] contrib/git-svn: use refs/remotes/git-svn instead of git-svn-HEAD
- From
- Nicolas Vilz 'niv' <nicolas@vilz.de>
- Date
- Mar 2, 2006, 21:17 UTC
- Message-ID
- <62157.84.163.95.215.1141334223.squirrel@mail.geht-ab-wie-schnitzel.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <20060302055831.GA16600@localdomain>
Show 7 quoted lines
> After reading a lengthy discussion on the list, I've come to the > conclusion that creating a 'remotes' directory in refs isn't > such a bad idea. > > You can still branch from it by specifying remotes/git-svn (not > needing the leading 'refs/'), and the documentation has been > updated to reflect that.
i got stuck in that.
git-svn does the remotes/svn-git reference good, git pull hasn't recognized it, yet. So i had to do a symlink from .git/refs/remotes to .git/refs/heads/ to do the git pull...
then i got a bit stuck because of conflicts.... which i resolved (thank god).
the third thing is that the git-svn commit command does deletions of certain files very often, when i commit some patches i pulled into my private-talk-to-svn-branch. in on of the next commits the same files are added again.. but i thought "o my god, i am screwed", when i saw the scheduled deletions the first time... that is a bit confusing for the users.
so in conclusion, i think, you should teach git pull to recognize refs/remotes as heads to be pulled from (not to be pulled at)...
btw, i like the visualization of the remotes-refs in gitk.
Nicolas