Re: Nobody is THE one making contribution
- From
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
- Date
- Dec 27, 2020, 18:47 UTC
- Message-ID
- <5fe8d6bf1a1a3_f1c220893@natae.notmuch>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqq5z4nqey1.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes: > > >> But if you are arguing that when you write "Signed-off-by:" your > >> sign-off can mean something other than what DCO says it means, > > > > The DCO has clause (d), which clearly states the developer must agree > > that a record of his/her contribution is maintained indefinitely (and > > that includes his/her sign off). > > Yes. Are you saying that you are OK with (a)-(c) but not (d)?
I'm saying if the author of the patch states "I don't agree with a record of my contribution being maintained indefinitely with my sign off", then clause (d) isn't met.
-- Felipe Contreras