Re: Gitbox
- From
- Joshua Juran <jjuran@gmail.com>
- Date
- Apr 13, 2011, 19:24 UTC
- Message-ID
- <5F5479DB-511E-4ADC-8B71-5D7C801ECEAF@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <1302722214.22161.5.camel@drew-northup.unet.maine.edu>
On Apr 13, 2011, at 12:16 PM, Drew Northup wrote:
Show 19 quoted lines
> On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 12:09 -0700, Joshua Juran wrote: > >> On Apr 13, 2011, at 11:59 AM, Drew Northup wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 11:16 -0700, Daniel Searles wrote: >> >>> >>>> I'm curious if Gitbox is in violation of the Git's GPL. >>>> http://www.gitboxapp.com/ >>> >>> Well, it appears that he may have implemented "git" on his own, or >>> at >>> the very least he's trying to imply that he did. >>> >>> http://www.gitboxapp.com/faq.html#gpl >> >> He very clearly says that he ships Git, not a reimplementation. > > He also clearly stated that he's not calling git command-line tools...
I wonder why he would ship them, then.
> "Gitbox neither links (statically or dynamically) against Git nor uses > custom interfaces to interact with it. Git binaries are provided for > your convenience only."
Calling execve() is not dynamic linking, that I'm aware of.
> I'm hoping he'll have a more complete statement for all of us.
I think you've misinterpreted his words, but I agree that a clarification to set minds at ease would be appropriate.
Josh