git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [PATCH] submodule: mark submodules with update=none as inactive

From
Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Date
Jun 22, 2021, 03:45 UTC
Message-ID
<56b5c722-8baf-9f9c-cc9f-5b5ed49d7fc3@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<20210619214449.2827705-1-sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Hi brian,
Le 2021-06-19 à 17:44, brian m. carlson a écrit :
Show 11 quoted lines
> When the user recursively clones a repository with submodules and one or
> more of those submodules is marked with the submodule.<name>.update=none
> configuration, the submodule will end up being active.  This is a
> problem because we will have skipped cloning or checking out the
> submodule, and as a result, other commands, such as git reset or git
> checkout, will fail if they are invoked with --recurse-submodules (or
> when submodule.recurse is true).
> 
> This is obviously not the behavior the user wanted, so let's fix this by
> specifically setting the submodule as inactive in this case when we're
> cloning the repository. 

I'm not sure we want to fix it only at (recursive) clone time. The original bug report was with 'git clone --recurse-submodules', but a non-recursive clone followed by the usual 'git submodule init && git submodule update' (or in one step 'git submodule update --init') would also lead to the same bad experience (I'm not sure I want to call it a bug per se... it's certainly a UX bug :)

Show 8 quoted lines
> That will make us properly ignore the submodule
> when performing recursive operations.
> 
> Note that we only do this when the --require-init option is passed,
> which is only passed during clone.  That's because the update-clone
> submodule helper is also invoked during a user-invoked git submodule
> update, where we explicitly indicate that we override the configuration
> setting, so we don't want to set such a configuration option then.

I'm not sure what you mean here by 'where we explicitely indicate that we override the configuration setting'. For me, as I wrote above, 'git clone --recurse-submodules' and 'git clone' followed by 'git submodule update --init' should lead to mostly [*] the same end result.

If you mean 'git submodule update --checkout', that indeed seems to sometimes override the 'update=none' configuration (a fact which is absent from the documentation), then it's true that we would not want to write 'active=false' at that invocation. As an aside, in my limited testing I could not always get 'git submodule update --checkout' to clone and checkout 'update=none' submdules; it would fail with "fatal: could not get a repository handle for submodule 'sub1'" because 'git checkout/reset --recurse-submodules' leaves a bad .git/modules/sub1/config file with the core.worktree setting when the command fails (this should not happen)...

In any case, that leads me to think that maybe the right place to write the 'active' setting would be during 'git submodule init', thus builtin/submodule--helper.c::init_submodule ? This way it would lead to the same behaviour if the clone was recursive or not, and it would not interfere with 'git submodule update --checkout'.

[*] I say 'mostly' because in the first case you end up with a 'submodule.active=.' configuration, and no 'submodule.$name.active' configuration for each submodule, whereas in the second case, there is no 'submodule.active' setting and 'submodule.$name.active' is true for each submodule.

Show 7 quoted lines
> 
> Reported-by: Rose Kunkel <rose@rosekunkel.me>
> Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
> ---
>   builtin/submodule--helper.c |  5 +++++
>   t/t5601-clone.sh            | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)

I think that such a change would warrant a mention in the doc, in gitsubmodules [1], git-config [2], and probably git-submodule [3] if we agree that 'git submodule init' is the right place to set the 'active=false' flag.

Thanks for proposing a patch!
Philippe.

[1] https://git-scm.com/docs/gitmodules#Documentation/gitmodules.txt-submoduleltnamegtupdate [2] https://git-scm.com/docs/git-config#Documentation/git-config.txt-submoduleltnamegtupdate [3] https://git-scm.com/docs/git-submodule#Documentation/git-submodule.txt-init--ltpathgt82308203

Previous: brian m. carlsonNext: brian m. carlson
Message 13 of 18 in “[BUG] `git reset --hard` fails with `update = none` submodules”
  1. Rose KunkelJun 16, 2021
  2. brian m. carlsonJun 16, 2021
  3. Rose KunkelJun 16, 2021
  4. Rose KunkelJun 16, 2021
  5. Rose KunkelJun 16, 2021
  6. brian m. carlsonJun 16, 2021
  7. Rose KunkelJun 16, 2021
  8. Rose KunkelJun 16, 2021
  9. Junio C HamanoJun 16, 2021
  10. Philippe BlainJun 16, 2021
  11. brian m. carlsonJun 17, 2021
  12. submodule: mark submodules with update=none as inactivebrian m. carlson, Jun 19, 2021
  13. Philippe BlainJun 22, 2021
  14. brian m. carlsonJun 25, 2021
  15. Philippe BlainJun 26, 2021
  16. submodule: mark submodules with update=none as inactivebrian m. carlson, Jul 1, 2021
  17. Philippe BlainJul 9, 2021
  18. brian m. carlsonJul 11, 2021

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.